INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL

https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2018.1478868


Impact of Digital Economy on Female Employment: Evidence from Turkey

Yhlas Sovbetov


Department of Economics, London School of Commerce, London, UK


CONTACT Yhlas Sovbetov ihlas.sovbetov @lsclondon.co.uk Department of Economics, London School of Commerce, Chaucer House, White Hart Yard, London SE1 1NX, UK


ABSTRACT

This paper investigates impact of e-economic activities on female employment rates in Turkey over 1994–2016. The analysis unveils three major findings. First, 80.74% of variations in female employ- ment are accounted by e-commerce and control variables. Second, Autoregressive Distributed Lag analysis documents that these series (female employment, e-commerce and control variables) are coin- tegrated, thus, a unit increase in per credit card e-commerce trans- actions leads the female employment rate to grow by 0.13 units in long-run at 1% significance level, whereas a percentage increase in internet penetration rate in Turkey augments the rates by 0.33%. Third, error-correction model analysis refers that the system quickly corrects its previous period disequilibrium converging at a speed of 75.43%, and also documents that the lags of per credit card e-commerce jointly have short-run impact on female employ- ment rates. Thus, the study concludes that developing e-commerce incentivizing policies might help to empower women in Turkey significantly.

KEYWORDS: Female employment; job creation; e-commerce; digitalization; cointegration; ARDL bound test

JEL CLASSIFICATIONS: L81; J21; J16; F16


  1. Introduction

    Internet technology has incredibly boosted up, after it started to be used as commer- cially oriented, changing consumption and shopping habits of individuals which, in turn, heated up not only domestic competition, but also global one as many economies became internationalized with the digital revolution.1 It has spread to such an extent that the global economy today is a digital economy, refuting an initial bias towards success of e- commerce initiatives such as Alibaba, Amazon, Ebay, BestBuy, and Gumtree that today became economically giant firms who manage huge resources. It has changed the structure of economics by reducing transaction, distribution, and marginal production costs, and enhancing accessibility and time efficiency. However, one of the most important impacts of digitalization is influence on the labor markets, both through the creation of new jobs and making labor markets more inclusive, innovative, flexible, and transparent (Nikulin, 2017).

    Therefore, the interaction between digitalization and employment is worth to study, as reflected in several researches (El Gawady, 2005; Khosrow-Pour, 2006; MacGregor

    & Vrazalic, 2007; Maier & Nair-Reichert, 2007; Manyika et al., 2014; Nikulin, 2017; Parnami & Bisawa, 2015; Raja et al., 2013; Vera, 2006). It is widely argued that digital- ization enables the inclusion of low-skilled and traditionally marginalized groups, such as women, people with disabilities, and workers at the base of the pyramid into the labor mar- ket. Especially in Muslim countries, any endeavors to scale the female labor participation up are frozen due to social and cultural barriers against female interaction with men. The segregation of the sexes in public or social locales as another fence against acceptance of female within working environment, particularly in management positions. Until recent times, the only possibility of enhancing female participation was related with logistical issues such as creating female only working places, special entrances and other separa- tion regulation which make it hard. However, with digitalization an alternative way is emerged. The barriers can be broken down through e-commerce which enables females to work from home in jobs such as customer services over the internet or even start- up self-employed online businesses. A relevant and practical example of such a policy was pursued by British government who successfully increased self-employment of men and women respectively by 4.73% and 19.06% in 2000 after encouraging e-commerce investments.

    In this research, we contribute to the relevant literature by examining impacts of dig- italization onto female employment over 1994–2016 using the largest data set available for Turkey. Our study distinguishes by being the first study (to our knowledge) in the Turkish literature that examines influences of digitalization of economy on female labor market. We use number of online commerce activities per credit cards and volume of credits attributable to the e-commerce activities per credit cards for a proxy of digitaliza- tion, and we get female employment rate by using a ratio of number of female employees in the country to the total female population at working age. As preliminary Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) unit test signals that the series are not integrated at same order – but mixture of I(0) and I(1) – we examine a potential long-run cointegration between them under Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration framework (Bound testing) which was introduced by Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001).

    Our results confirm a significant cointegration between digitalization and female employment in Turkey. More specifically, we detect short-run influences between series as well. By employing error-correction model analysis, we find that the cointegrated series quickly converge to a long-run equilibrium at a speed of 75.43% quarterly. Our results are robust against different control variables and proxies used for e-commerce. The remainder of the paper is as follows. The second section addresses the literature and the role of e- commerce in the labor market and in particular in the process of women’s empowerment. The third section is devoted to the description of the data and the methodology. The fourth section covers analysis and reports its findings.

    1 http://www.internetlivestats.com/: Worldwide Internet activities in 1 second: 1,948 Skype calls; 10,860 tweets; 51,750 google searches; 112,345 youtube video plays; 3,081 Instagram photo uploads; 800 Apple store and 964 Android store app downloads; 312,500 whatsapp messages; 2,446,928 emails (it was just 113,000 emails in 2000); 3 new websites (there was only 1 website in 1991, but today it is about 1 trillion websites); 5 computer and 40 smart phone sales; USD 2,361 Amazon sales; and 31,368 GB of internet traffic.

  2. E-commerce Literature

    Although job creation feature of digitalization is widely accepted, without focused digital- consistent policies that embrace all digital nature of global flows, its impact is very limited. Just after dot-com crisis, enormous economies such as OECD, European Community (hereinafter EC), and US clustered to organize digital flows and develop digital-consistent policies to seize all its opportunities efficiently. In March 2000, EC held an annual summit at Lisbon (Portugal) to discuss and plan how to promote European economic well-being by increasing employment through new job creations of digitalization. They had projected to create 15 million new jobs through e-commerce policies, and thus to increase both male (61%) and female (51%) employment rates to 70% and 60% respectively.2 According to Muylle and Vijverman (2013), today this aim is excessively accomplished as EC was able to create 3.4 million (1.5 million direct and 3.4 millions indirect) new jobs annually and pull up employment rates to the targeted level.

    McKinsey Global Institute published a report where Manyika et al. (2014) examine dynamics of global flows and their impact on GDP growth by covering 195 countries over 1980–2012. They discover two chief driving forces behind acceleration of growth and global flow hike after 2000: (1) an increasing global welfare, and (2) growing diffusion of internet connectivity and digital technologies. Their correlation analysis reveals a signifi- cant positive relationship between all types of flows and GDP growth, and they forecast that global flows contribute to global GDP growth annually by $250–450 billion which is equiv- alent to 15–25% of total global growth. They also state that flows of goods, services, and finance exceeded $26 trillion by 2012 which is 36% of total global GDP, and estimate that it could triple by 2025 continuing to contribute to the economic growth if rising digitalization persists. They highlight that impact of digitalization on economy occurs chiefly through two main macroeconomic dynamics: (1) Price inflation and (2) Employment. First, the reduction in transaction, distribution, and marginal production costs, in turn, contributes in reducing price growth, thus it provides efficient control over inflation (Henry & Dal- ton, 2000). For instance, in his study El Gawady (2005) finds that e-commerce policies applied by US and UK lead to a reduction in price inflation by 0.5 basis points from 2.3% to 1.8%. Second, Manyika et al. (2014) underlines that the knowledge-intensive portion of global flows progressively dominates (grows faster than) capital- and labor-intensive flows creating digital platforms which enable new players and agents to participate into sectors. In the eve of digitization era (1980s), governments and multinational firms were the only actors involved in cross-border exchanges, however, today digital technologies enable even the smallest firms or entrepreneurs to be a ‘micro multinational’ that sell and source products, services, and ideas across borders. In turn, it generates a significant impact on employment, especially self-employment. Although the digitalization might cause a job lose to some extent, it creates many new jobs. For instance, Vera (2006) studies impact of e-commerce on overall employment level through 11 different industries in Philippines, and finds that e-commerce destroys 1202 jobs while it creates 21,298 jobs in economy in the period 2000–2005. Briefly it replaces 17 jobs for every job lost. The author also gives emphasis to the other economic benefits of online stores which is accessible globally and open for 7/24, as well as offers cheap prices due to minimized expenses unlike physical store which has to pay rent for venue and bills.


    2 See Lisbon European Council 23–24 March 2000 Report at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm.

    Table 1. E-commerce share in globe.



    Country

    E-commerce/total retail (%)

    Internet penetration (%)

    Online shopping (%)

    Income per capita (USD)

    Population (mln)

    UK

    10.4

    87

    85

    37,000

    64

    US

    7.4

    81

    72

    53,000

    316

    Germany

    6.0

    84

    79

    40,000

    81

    China

    5.6

    42

    44

    10,000

    1361

    France

    5.5

    83

    75

    36,000

    64

    Poland

    5.3

    65

    30

    21,000

    39

    Japan

    4.2

    79

    77

    37,000

    127

    Brazil

    3.1

    49

    34

    12,000

    198

    Spain

    3.1

    72

    55

    30,000

    47

    Russia

    2.8

    53

    38

    18,000

    143

    Italy

    1.8

    58

    44

    30,000

    60

    Turkey

    1.3

    49

    24

    15,000

    76

    India

    0.7

    12

    23

    4000

    1243

    Source: TUBISAD (2016).


    It is widely accepted that digitalization and e-commerce activities born in US and spread out to other countries starting with EU. Still it has not been highly mobilized yet in Turkey. The Informatics Industry Association (TUBISAD) reports that the volume of e-commerce market of Turkey in 2016 is about 8.5 billion USD (14 billion Turkish Lira) which represents just 1.3% of the country’s total retail consumptions (see Table 1). This ratio is remarkably low comparing to advanced economies, and the report addresses it to the fact that one third of Turkish population has never used internet yet, and only1 out of 10 users has involved, at least once, in e-commerce activities, even though Turkey is ranked ninth in online market attractiveness. In sum, the report highlights that the country has a significant potential which still remains dormant awaiting a spark to stir up, and it could be utilized to vivify the whole economy, especially, through labor markets.

    Comparing growth of American and Turkish e-commerce activities in industrial base will show the distinction more clearly. Table 2 displays 2015 e-commerce sales activity in US and Turkey. Notice that almost all product categories experienced two digit year-to-year growth in US, while Turkish sales growth moderately. Also, in US all low ranked categories grew over 20% annually, whereas they grew only 1–4% in Turkey. Indeed, it signifies that these low ranked categories promise aggressive growth in Turkey in coming few years, and notice that these categories (Toy and Hobbies; Flowers, Greetings and Misc. Gifts; Books and Magazines; Sport and Fitness; and Jewelry and Watches) are more likely to be female- attributable than male-attributable in terms of employment.

    Ikidilim, Turkish e-commerce consulting company, published a comprehensive report of electronic commerce activities in Turkey in 2016. The report reveals dominance of female-attributable digital stores in Turkish e-market. Table 3 shows that ‘Electronic Device’ store has the highest penetration rate of e-commerce activities (32%), and it is fol- lowed by ‘House Decoration’ (20%), ‘Mothers, Babies, and Toys’ (19%), ‘Cosmetics, Health, and Home Care’ (18%), ‘Kitchen & Home Appliances’ (15%), and ‘Jewelry’ (10%) stores. More importantly, notice that majority of e-commerce branches employed females rather than males. The ratio of female employee in the branch is absolutely remarkable in House Decoration, Mothers and Babies, and Cosmetics-Health care industries. This dominance promises huge opportunities rising for women in e-commerce, especially, when we con- sider just averagely 13% penetration of e-commerce in selected branches in Turkey. The report of readiness of immediate employment also supports this statement. Notice that 81% of e-commerce adopted firms are ready to employ one additional employee imme- diately where 82% of these firms give priority to female employee and just 18% wants to employ males.


    Table 2. E-commerce in US and Turkey.

    US

    Turkey

    Product category

    Sales rank

    Y/Y growth

    Sales rank

    Y/Y growth

    Apparel and Accessories

    1

    Very strong

    10

    Moderate

    Computer Hardware

    2

    Moderate

    2

    Strong

    Consumer Packaged Goods

    3

    Moderate

    6

    Moderate

    Digital Content and Subscriptions

    4

    Moderate

    13

    Strong

    Consumer Electronics

    5

    Moderate

    1

    Strong

    Event Tickets

    6

    Very strong

    14

    Strong

    Office Supplies

    7

    Strong

    7

    Moderate

    Furniture, Appliances and Equipment

    8

    Strong

    8

    Moderate

    Books and Magazines

    9

    Strong

    17

    Weak

    Home and Garden

    10

    Strong

    12

    Moderate

    Computer Software

    11

    Strong

    3

    Strong

    Sport and Fitness

    12

    Very strong

    11

    Weak

    Jewelry and Watches

    13

    Very strong

    9

    Moderate

    Flowers, Greetings and Misc. Gifts

    14

    Very strong

    16

    Weak

    Toy and Hobbies

    15

    Very strong

    15

    Weak

    Video Games, Consoles and Accessories

    16

    Very strong

    4

    Strong

    Music, Movies and Videos

    17

    Very strong

    5

    Strong

    Note: Growth rate very strong: +20%, strong: 10–19%, moderate: 5–9%, weak: 1–4%.

    Source: comScore (2015, p. 16) and Ikidilim (2016).


    Table 3. Penetration of e-commerce in Turkey.



    Pen. (%)

    Male (%)

    Female (%)


    Pen. (%)

    Male (%)

    Female (%)

    Branch (Store)

    Departments

    Electronic Device

    32

    58

    42

    Sales

    85

    25

    75

    House Decoration

    20

    12

    88

    Finance and Accounting

    58

    55

    45

    Mothers, Babies, Toys

    19

    4

    96

    Administrative Affairs

    48

    58

    42

    Cosmetics-Health Care

    18

    3

    97

    Logistics and Warehouse

    44

    55

    45

    Kitchen and Home Appliances

    15

    45

    55

    Marketing and Product Man.

    42

    30

    70

    Jewelry

    10

    40

    60

    Support and Customer Services

    41

    45

    55

    Sports and Outdoor

    10

    48

    52

    Human Resources

    40

    15

    85

    Fast Food 9 52 48

    9

    52

    48

    Ready for Immediate Employment

    Apparel and Shoes

    9

    36

    64

    1 Employee

    81

    18

    82

    Tourism

    7

    38

    62

    2–3 Employees

    16

    36

    64

    Book, Film, and Music

    5

    35

    65

    4–9 Employees

    2

    42

    58

    Pet Shop

    3

    47

    53

    +10 Employees

    1

    45

    55

    Average

    13

    35

    65

    Source: Ikidilim (2016).


    Khosrow-Pour (2006) also supports important role of e-commerce developments in female employment. He denotes that social and cultural barriers against female interac- tion with men freezes any endeavors to scale the female labor participation up, especially, in Muslim countries. He points out the segregation of the sexes in public or social locales as another fence against acceptance of female within working environment, particularly in management positions. He underlines that the only possibility of enhancing female

    participation until recent times was related with logistical issues such as creating female only working places, special entrances and other separation regulation which make it hard. However, the author believes that these barriers can be broken down through e-commerce which enables females to work from home in jobs such as customer services over the inter- net. Equally, MacGregor and Vrazalic (2007) support Khosrow-Pour’s assertions, and state that British government had successfully increased self-employment of men and women respectively by 4.73% and 19.06% in 2000 after encouraging e-commerce investments. Similarly, Maier and Nair-Reichert (2007) in his study complies and reports several of suc- cessful e-commerce applications that helped to increase female labor participation in India. He talks about ‘Computer Facility’, ‘E-Seva’, ‘IT-School’, and ‘India Shop’ programs where a group of non-working housewives are taught about utilization of internet technology and techniques of e-commerce through courses and seminars. At the end, the author states that all participants successfully employed either at existing e-commerce companies or they started their own business and became self-employed. Maier denotes that the Indian gov- ernment launched and encouraged many of these kind programs, thus, eventually volume of Indian e-commerce increased from 3.8 billion USD in 2009 to 9.5 billion USD in 2012, subsequently to 12.6 billion USD in 2013 making 34% annual growth.

    On the other hand, current labor share in national income is about 34% in Turkey which is the lowest ratio among any country in OECD, even lower than Mexico. The main cause of this fact is dramatically low level of the country’s female labor participation rate which is about 30.8% far below than US (67.2%), EU average (63%), and OECD average (62.6%). Today, Turkey has the lowest female employment rate with 27.1% among OECD where the average is 57.2%.3 More dramatically October 2016 report4 of Turkish Statisti- cal Institute (TurkStat) unrolls that this rate is even worse in non-agriculture industries. The report states that 90% of new unemployed in each quarter are formed by females, and 95.55% of this is formed by unemployed females in non-agriculture industries. Thus, overall female unemployment is 12% in the economy, but it scales up to 16.3% in urban areas and to 18% in non-agriculture industries due to a rural exodus that forces less edu- cated women, who used to work in the fields, to stay at home once the family had moved to an urban area, and also due to a prevalent conservative image of gender roles in the labor market. Impact of these causes (chiefly rural exodus) is blatant during 1989–2005 (in Figure 1) where female employment rates drops from 32.70% to 20.7%. On the other hand, Berber and Yilmaz Eser (2008) argue that this longstanding decrease was also partially motivated by the prolongation of time spent in education of young population that cause their delay to participate to labor. They highlight that the tertiary education enrollment has increased comparing to the past years while time spent in education also scaled from 5 years up to 8 years. Subsequently, the female employment rate starts to rally after 2005, and Gursel, Uysal, and Acar (2014) addresses it to the developments in service industry. However, Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA, 2016) emphat- ically denotes that internet penetration remarkable change the course of both social and economic life after 2005 in Turkey, giving emphasis to its positive correlation with female employment.


    3 See OECD ‘Statistics of Female Employment’ at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/employment-rate-of-women_ 20752342-table5.

    4 See TurkStat ‘Labor Statistics’ at https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/isgucuapp/isgucu.zul.


    Female employment rate in Turkey

    Figure 1. Female employment rate in Turkey. Source: TurkStat (2016).



    Reasons of non-participation of female to labor in Turkey

    Figure 2. Reasons of non-participation of female to labor. Source: TurkStat (2016).

    Notes: ‘Hopeless to find a job’, ‘Student’, and ‘Others’ variables follow the Axis ‘A’, while ‘Busy with House Chores’ follows the Axis ‘B’. ‘Others’ variable excludes females who do not want to work and also who are not available to work or cannot work. It also excludes seasonal unemployed and retired females.


    The reasons of non-participation of female into labor are essential. The 2016 report of TurkStat shows that fraction of non-participating females who have no hope to find any job gradually increased from 0.78% in 1990 to 1.59% in 2009, as in Figure 2. On contrary, fraction of non-participating females who are busy with housing chores has significantly decreased over time. Particularly, after 1998 with internetalization era, this fraction has experienced sharp declines, i.e. from 78.42% in 1998 to 57.85% in 2016. Moreover, a remarkable increase in fraction of non-participation of females due to their education enrollment can be addressed to assertion of Berber and Yilmaz Eser (2008), however, an increase in ‘other’ reasons remain unknown.


  3. Data and Methodology

    The literature about impact of Turkish e-commerce activities on female employment rates is scarce. Sizeable studies investigate the progress of e-commerce and its impact on growth,

    however, its impact on female employment is often neglected. This paper aims to fill this room by examining impact of e-commerce activities on female employment rates through quarterly periods over 1994–2016. For analysis, we consider a simple times-series model as below.

    \[ FE_{t} = \beta_{0} + \sum_{i=1}^{3} \beta_{it} X_{it} + \sum_{i=4}^{5} \beta_{it} Z_{it} + e_{t} \tag{1} \]

    where FEt is a female employment rate of Turkey at time t, and β0 is an intercept. Due to unavailability of e-commerce data for years before 1994, this ‘t’ is restricted with 1994–2016 periods. The ‘X’, in the model, represents online commerce activities which are proxied by three variables: number of e-commerce transactions per credit cards (EC), the volume of credit per cards (CC), and the country’s internet penetration rate (IP). Data for EC and CC variables are derived from ICTA (2016) and ICC (2016) reports respectively. Likewise the internet penetration rate represents percentage of people with internet access in total population, and its data are gathered from online database of World Bank.

    Besides ‘Z’ stands for two control variables, i.e. real output (GDP) and inflations rate (INF), in order to capture their empirically proven impact on employment rates (Okun, 1962; Phillips, 1958). Controlling these two macroeconomic factors will help us to derive clearer impact of digitalization on female employment rates. Many of other macroeco- nomic variables might also have relationship with FE, however, majority of them affect FE through GDP channel. Moreover, inclusion of other control variables also might raise potential collinearity problem in the model, which can emerge misleading standard errors and estimates.

    The data for female employment rates and control variables are obtained from TurkStat (see footnote 4) and OECD (see footnote 3) databases respectively. We also check for poten- tial collinearity between explanatory variables utilizing cross-variable correlation analysis (see Appendix 1) and confirm robustness of the model. Lastly, we briefly summarize our data at Table 4 providing descriptive statistics.


    1. Model Specification

      In initial step, we check whether the input variables satisfy a stationarity assumption of ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation technique by ADF test with regression equation as below.


      Table 4. Descriptive statistics of data.


      Mean

      Median

      Max.

      Min.

      Std. dev.

      Skewness

      Kurtosis

      Jarque–Bera prob.

      N

      FE

      25.09

      26.05

      30.00

      18.6

      2.99

      0.35

      1.25

      0.0888

      92

      EC

      34.39

      38.13

      48.85

      6.23

      10.58

      1.25

      3.62

      0.0000

      92

      CC

      2.78

      2.32

      8.37

      0.03

      2.51

      0.60

      2.18

      0.0244

      92

      IP

      18.52

      13.93

      49.00

      0.04

      17.47

      0.44

      1.62

      0.0089

      92

      GDP

      195.29

      161.82

      706.20

      0.88

      179.14

      0.84

      2.90

      0.0043

      92

      INF

      36.06

      10.85

      100.55

      4.30

      33.12

      0.57

      1.64

      0.0039

      92

      Notes: FE is ratio of female employees in the country to female working age population; GDP is quarterly inflation adjusted total output in billions Turkish Lira (TL); INF is a quarterly percentage change in consumer price levels; EC represents the number of online commerce activities per credit cards; CC shows the volume of credits that are attributable to the e- commerce activities per credit cards in thousands of TL; and IP shows percentage of internet penetration among total population in the country.


      Table 5. Output of ADF analysis.

      Level 1st Difference

      Variables

      ADF

      Lag

      DW

      ADF

      Lag

      DW

      FE

      1.0279

      3

      1.9218

      12.051***

      2

      1.9266

      EC

      3.8201***

      4

      1.9678

      CC

      0.3830

      2

      2.0857

      3.9014***

      1

      2.0827

      IP

      0.3337

      1

      1.8219

      3.0804**

      0

      1.8322

      GDP

      1.3865

      8

      2.0038

      3.4712**

      7

      1.9945

      INF

      1.2306

      5

      2.0165

      3.5974***

      4

      2.0207

      Notes: Numbers in the table are t-statistics generated by ADF unit root test with null hypothesis of H0: the series has a unit root. The lag is automatically selected by SIC with maximum lags of 11. DW represents Durbin–Watson statistics. For abbreviations see Table 4


      \[ \Delta X_{t} = \alpha_{0} + \delta T + \rho X_{t-1} + \sum_{i=1}^{k} \alpha_{i} \Delta X_{t-i} + \nu_{t} \tag{2} \]

      where ΔXt is the first difference of a variable x; T is trend, and δ is its multiplier; k is a optimal lag length; ΔXt 1 is lag differences; and vt is White Noise residual term. Here, ADF tests whether ρ = 0 holds or ρ < 0. In case of ρ = 0, the variable fails to satisfy the stationarity assumption.

      Table 5 displays aftermath of ADF analysis where all series except EC appear non- stationary at level. But they turn out stationary after taking their first differences. Therefore, we conclude that EC is I(0) variables, while others are I(1). Indeed, in this circumstance neither OLS regression (at level) nor Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) coin- tegration model are applicable. Still the interaction of e-commerce and female employment rate can be estimated by utilizing ARDL cointegration framework which is also known as Bound testing approach.


    2. ARDL Approach

      There are three straightforward cases in building a framework with our input series. First, a OLS model that requires all series to be I(0) (stationary). Second, if series are integrated in same order, but not cointegrated, they can be still estimated with OLS by utilizing series in form of their first differences in case they are I(1). Additionally if residuals signalize that input series are cointegrated, and then Engle and Granger (1987) or Johansen (1988) approaches can be pursued to assess long-run relationship, subsequently error-correction model can be built under OLS estimation to measure their short-run relationship. Third, in case some series in the model are I(0) while some are I(1) but none are I(2) as in our case, then Bound testing methodology (ARDL), which was introduced by Pesaran et al. (2001), can be employed. Therefore, we recall our base model (1), and adjust it in accordance to the ARDL approach following Pesaran et al. (2001) as below.

      \[ \Delta FE_{t} = \delta_{0} + \sum_{i=1}^{p} \delta_{i} \Delta FE_{t-i} + \sum_{j=1}^{3} \sum_{i=0}^{q_{j,k,l}} \theta_{ji} \Delta X_{jt-i} + \sum_{j=1}^{2} \sum_{i=0}^{m_{j,n}} \gamma_{ji} \Delta Z_{jt-i} + \varphi_{1} FE_{t-1} \tag{3} \]

      \[ \quad + \sum_{j=1}^{3} \varphi_{2j} X_{jt-1} + \sum_{j=1}^{2} \varphi_{3j} Z_{jt-1} + \omega_{t} \]

      where X stands for three e-commerce variables of EC, CC, and IP; and Z stands for two control variables of GDP and INF. The lag of dependent variable starts from 1 to its optimal lag length (p). However, the independent variables begin from lag zero and continue up to their optimal, i.e. q for EC, k for CC, l for IP, m for GDP, and n for INF, which are determined by Schwarz Information Criterion (SIC).

      Eventually, the null hypotheses of ϕ1 = ϕ2j = ϕ3j = 0 is tested with Wald analysis where rejection of H0 under Pesaran et al. (2001) lower and upper bound critical val- ues indicates existence of long-run cointegration between series only if the residual of

      (1) model (et ) is stationary. In case of justification of these requirements the Restricted Error-Correction Model (RECM) can be formulated as below.

      \[ \Delta FE_{t} = \delta_{0} + \sum_{i=1}^{p} \delta_{i} \Delta FE_{t-i} + \sum_{j=1}^{3} \sum_{i=0}^{q_{j,k,l}} \theta_{ji} \Delta X_{jt-i} + \sum_{j=1}^{2} \sum_{i=0}^{m_{j,n}} \gamma_{ji} \Delta Z_{jt-i} + \lambda_{1} ECT_{t-1} + \omega_{t} \tag{4} \]

      where ECTt 1 is a lag of stationary residual of (1) model (et 1), and λ1 is it multiplier which is expected to be significant and negatively signed in bounds of 1 λ 0, indicating convergence towards equilibrium. This also shows the speed of self-adjustment of RECM model back to equilibrium by correcting its previous period disequilibrium following a shock that disturbs this equilibrium. In case λ derives positive estimate, then it signalizes that the model comprises autocorrelation problem (so model divergences from long-run equilibrium instead of converging), which strictly needs to be fixed. And if λ < 1, then the model is not stable over time horizon, indicating potential structural breaks to should be corrected (Sovbetov & Saka, 2018).


  4. Analysis and Results

    1. ARDL Model Selection

Initially, we ensure that residual of (1) model (et ) is stationary at 1% significance level. Subsequently, we determine lags of dependant variable (p) and regressors (q, k, l, m, n) carrying ARDL optimal lag selection test with maximum lag length of 6 under SIC. Evaluating twenty different ARDL models we find out ARDL(1,4,1,2,2,0) model as the most appropriate with the minimum SIC value of 4.0142 (see Figure 3).

Further, we check robustness of this model testing whether its residuals are serially non-correlated and have equal variances or not. Table 6 summarizes the results of these diagnostic tests confirming healthiness of the ARDL model which accounts 80.74% varia- tions in llFE at 1% significant level. Plus, we assess stability of the model by employing a cumulative sum of squares of recursive residuals (CUSUM) test that examines changes in CUSUM over time. Consequently, the CUSUM graph in the Figure 4 demonstrates that the model is stable over the analysis period as its CUSUM line does not exceed ±5% significance (two dashed) lines.

Further, we hypothesize ϕ1 = ϕ21 = ϕ22 = ϕ23 = ϕ31 = ϕ32 = 0 statement utilizing Wald test in order to examine whether these series (female employment, e-commerce and control variables) have long-run interactions. The analysis derives t-statistics of 5.39 (see Table 7) which highly exceeds Pesaran et al. upper bounds’ critical value of Case III at 1% significance level, signifying existence of a strong long-run cointegration between series. We dear critical values of Case III that are presented in Pesaran et al. (2001) at table CI as it is specified for models that comprises unrestricted intercept value and no any kind of trends. The reason of excluding the trend factor is due it its statistical insignificance.


ARDL optimal lag selection test


Figure 3. ARDL optimal lag selection test.



Table 6. Estimating coefficients of ARDL model.

Variables

Coefficients

Variables

Coefficients

ϕ1 = FEt 1

1.2785*** (0.1574)

θ 14 = ΔECt 4

0.3993* (0.2129)

ϕ21 = ECt 1

0.1689*** (0.0491)

θ 20 = ΔCCt

5.1427 (3.6415)

ϕ22 = CCt 1

0.0316 (0.0522)

θ 21 = ΔCCt 1

6.3324* (3.7573)

ϕ23 = IPt 1

0.4243*** (0.0804)

θ 30 = ΔIPt

0.3910 (0.3462)

ϕ24 = GDPt 1

0.0681* (0.0355)

θ 31 = ΔIPt 1

0.1577 (0.4257)

ϕ25 = INFt 1

0.0307* (0.0162)

θ 32 = ΔIPt 2

0.8348* (0.4372)

δ1 = ΔFEt 1

0.4519*** (0.1210)

γ 10 = ΔGDPt

0.0865** (0.0428)

θ 10 = ΔECt

0.0625 (0.1118)

γ Δ = ΔGDPt 1

0.0209 (0.0266)

θ 11 = ΔECt 1

0.3964** (0.1784)

γ 12 = ΔGDPt 2

0.0472* (0.0249)

θ 12 = ΔECt 2

θ 13 = ΔECt 3

R-square

0.0947* (0.0483)

0.3718** (0.1579)

0.8074

γ 20 = ΔINFt

δ0 = Intercept BPG test

0.0215 (0.0296)

17.1056*** (3.0878)

0.7765

F-statistics

11.5642

Harvey test

0.0947

SIC

4.0142

Glejser test

0.3682

BG Serial LM

0.1296

White test

0.5170

Notes: The numbers in the table are coefficients estimated by ARDL technique with HAC-robust standard errors. BG is Breusch–Godfrey Serial Correlation test where the residual is regressed on its six lags hypothesizing H0 (residuals have no serial correlation) against alternative H1 (residuals are serially correlated). BPG (Breusch–Pagan–Godfrey), Harvey, and Glejser are types of heteroskedasticity tests that regress the squared residuals, the logs of the squared residuals, and the absolute residuals on the original regressors respectively, and White test regresses the squared residuals on the cross product of the original regressors including a constant term. All these tests hypothesize H0 (Homoskedasticity) against alternative H1 (Heteroskedasticity). The asterisk denotes statistical significance in following order: *10%, **5%, and ***1%.



CUSUM Stability ARDL test

Figure 4. Stability of selected optimal ARDL model.


Table 7. F-test with bound critical values.

Bounds

Significance level

Case III (k = 5)

Lower Bound [I(0)]

1% level

3.41

Upper Bound [I(1)]

1% level

4.68

Lower Bound [I(0)]

5% level

2.62

Upper Bound [I(1)]

5% level

3.79

Lower Bound [I(0)]

10% level

2.26

Upper Bound [I(1)]

Wald test F-statistics of ARDL(1,4,1,2,2,0)

10% level

3.35

5.39***

Notes: The k indicates the number original regressors in the model. Therefore, it is 5 for (2.0) model (disregarding FEt 1 as it is autoregressor of dependent variable). The asterisk denotes statistical significance in following order: *10%, **5%, and

***1%.


The magnitude of detected cointegration (long-run multiplier) is computed with neg- ative ratio of coefficients of independent variables to dependent one (ϕi/ϕ1). Thus, the ARDL model estimates that 1 unit increase in EC leads to 0.13 units increase in FE in long- run, while a percentage increase in IP, GDP, and INF scale FE up by 0.33%, 0.05%, and 0.02% respectively5 in long-run. On the other hand, the model fails to detect statistical significant long-run impact running from CC to FE.

Further, we recall the (3) model that was formulated in methodology section in order to examine short-run dynamics of FE using RECM technique. This also provides evidence for how quickly cointegrated series converge to their long-run equilibrium. Table 8 presents results derived by RECM analysis where coefficients of independent variables imply their short-run causality on FE, and coefficient of λ1 indicates the speed of error correction. As expected λ1 derives statistically significant negative value that is bonded between 1 and 0. This implies the model does not have serial correlation and instability problems caused by structural breaks in data (Sovbetov & Saka, 2018). Its magnitude of 0.7543 indicates that


5 Long-run multipliers for EC, IP, GDP, and INF are calculated by formula –ϕi = ϕ1 where i represents related explanatory variable. In this respect, long-run multiplier for EC is 0.1689/1.2785 = 0.1321; for IP is 0.4243/1.2785 = 0.3319; GDP is 0.0681/1.2785 = 0.0532; and for INF is 0.0307/1.2785 = 0.0240.

Table 8. Estimating of RECM coefficients.


Variables

Coefficients

Variables

Coefficients

δ0 = Intercept δ1 = ΔFEt 1 θ 10 = ΔECt

θ 11 = ΔECt 1

θ 12 = ΔECt 2

θ 13 = ΔECt 3

0.8533** (0.4316)

0.3451*** (0.1165)

0.0914* (0.0531)

0.0819** (0.0388)

0.1398 (0.1055)

0.1127* (0.0582)

θ 30 = ΔIPt

θ 31 = ΔIPt 1

θ 32 = ΔIPt 2

γ 10 = ΔGDPt

γ 11 = ΔGDPt 1

γ 12 = ΔGDPt 2

0.0971 (0.1082)

0.1295 (0.1245)

0.1112 (0.0764)

0.0323** (0.0155)

0.0157** (0.0079)

0.0111 (0.0127)

θ 14 = ΔECt 4

θ 20 = ΔCCt

0.1375** (0.0654)

2.0518 (2.8303)

γ 20 = ΔINFt

λ1 = ECTt 1

0.0209 (0.0318)

0.7543*** (0.1676)

θ 21 = ΔCCt 1

2.4457 (2.0122)

R-square

0.7526

Hypotheses for jointly short-run

impacts

BG LM

0.1781

H01 (EC)

3.0793**

BPG

0.6798

H02 (CC)

0.9784

Harvey

0.6245

H03 (IP)

1.3427

Glejser

0.8130

H04 (GDP)

4.1626***

CUSUM

Stable

H05 (INF)

0.4345

Notes: The table displays estimates derived by RECM analysis. The asterisk denotes statistical significance in following order:

*10%, **5%, and ***1%. The numbers in diagnostics (below) part of the table are probability values of related tests. In the bottom right part of table the Wald analysis of four hypotheses are presented where numbers are F-statistics.


the model corrects its previous period’s disequilibrium at a speed of 75.43% quarterly. This, indeed, is a quick convergence rate which implies a tight cointegration between series. For robustness, we examine diagnostics of RECM’s residual by employing Breusch–Godfrey Lagrange multiplier (BG LM) serial correlation alongside with various heteroscedasticity tests and stability of the model with CUSUM test. As a result, CUSUM test confirms stabil- ity of the model, and the results of diagnostics tests suggest not rejecting null hypotheses implying that residuals are homoskedastic and not serially correlated. Moreover, to assess jointly short-run impacts we employ Wald analysis testing below hypotheses:


H01: θ 10 = θ 11 = θ 12 = θ 13 = θ 14 = 0 against H11: θ 1j 0,

H02: θ 20 = θ 21 = θ 22 = θ 23 = θ 24 = θ 25 = 0 against H12: θ 2j 0,

H03: θ 30 = θ 31 = θ 32 = θ 33 = θ 34 = θ 35 = θ 36 = 0 against H13: θ 3j 0,

H04: γ 10 = γ 11 = γ 12 = γ 13 = γ 14 = 0 against H14: γ 1j 0,

H05: γ 20 = 0 against H15: γ 20 0,

The results of Wald tests suggest rejecting H01 and H04 hypotheses at 5% and 1% signif- icance levels respectively, while tests fails to reject H02, H03, and H05 hypotheses. In other words, lags of EC jointly have significant impact on FE in short-run at 5% level, while lags of GDP jointly generate short-run causality on FE at 1% levels. Thus, we conclude that digitalization has significant role in stirring the female employment up both in short- and long-run time horizons, especially through e-commerce transactions per credit cards, while internet penetration rate seems to be significant only in long-run.


5. Conclusion

The paper investigates interaction of e-commerce activities and female employment rates in Turkey through 1994–2016, and finds plausible results. First, stationarity of residual of (1) model signifies a potential long-run cointegrated relationship between variables, and ADF test suggests framing an ARDL model. By accounting 80.74% variations in female employment rates, the ARDL model estimates a unit increase in e-commerce transactions per credit cards (EC) and internet penetration rate (IP) augment the female employ- ment (FE) rates by 0.13 and 0.33 units respectively in long-run at 1% significance level. Apparently, EC seems to have statistically significant short-run impact on FE as well.

These results suggest that Turkey can empower women by enhancing internet infras- tructure investments and incentivizing e-commerce initiatives which, in turn, create a positive impact on online commerce activities in short-run, and thus on female employ- ment rates in long-run. On the other hand, the model fails to detect any causality running from credit volume expansion rates to female employment.

In addition, control variables real output and inflation rates seem to positively related with female employment in long-run as expected due to their empirically proven rela- tionships (Okun’s law and Phillips Curve). Moreover, RECM analysis reveals that real output also has deterministic role on female employment in short-run as its lags generate statistically significant joint impact on FE.

The error-correction model also shows that the cointegrated series cannot drift too far apart, and converge to a long-run equilibrium at a speed of 75.43% quarterly. In other words, the model corrects 75.43% of its previous quarter disequilibrium in current quarter.


Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.


Notes on contributor

Yhlas Sovbetov holds PhD degree in Economics from Istanbul University, and is currentlya research fellow in the Department of Economics at London School of Commerce. His areas of research interest include international economics, growth economics, labour economics, early crisis warning sytem (EWS), financial economics, and asset pricing.


References

Berber, M., & Yilmaz Eser, B. (2008). Türkiye ’de Kadın İstihdamı: Ülke Ve Bölge Düzeyinde Sektörel Analiz. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 10(2), 1–16. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/isguc/issue/25497/268878

comScore. (2015, May). State of the U.S. online retail economy in Q1 2015. In Andrew Lipsman and Gian Fulgoni (Speakers), comScore Webinar (pp. 1–45). Retrieved from http://www.comscore. com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2015/State-of-the-US-Online-Retail-Economy- in-Q1-2015

El Gawady, Z. M. (2005, November). The impact of e-commerce on developed and developing countries case study: Egypt and United States (pp. 21–32). Presented at International Conference of Glob- alization, Technology and Sustainable Development, United Arab Emirates University, World Association for sustainable Development, Al Ain, UAE.

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

Gursel, S., Uysal, G.,& Acar, A. (2014). Kadin Isgucu Piyasasinda Carpici Gelismeler. Betam Research Note, 14(160), 1–11.

Henry, D., & Dalton, D. (2000). Information technology industries. In R. Shapiro, J. Mayer, & L. Price (Eds.), Digital economy 2000 (pp. 23–32). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

ICC. (2016). Interbank card center annual reports. Retrieved from http://www.bkm.com.tr/ annual-reports.bkm

ICTA. (2016). Information and communication technologies authority reports. Retrieved from http://www.btk.gov.tr/kutuphane_ve_veribankasi/raporlar/faaliyet_raporlari/index.php

Ikidilim. (2016). E-Ticaret Sektöründe İstihdamın Ayak İzleri. Turkish e-commerce reports. Retrieved from http://eticaretmag.com/turkiye-e-ticaret-sektorunde-istihdam-durumu-infografik/

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.

Khosrow-Pour, M. (2006). Encyclopedia of e-commerce, e-government, and mobile commerce. Singa- pore: Idea.

MacGregor, R., & Vrazalic, L. (2007). E-commerce in regional small to medium enterprises. New York: IGI.

Maier, S., & Nair-Reichert, U. (2007). Empowering women through ICT-based business initiatives: An overview of best practices in e-commerce/e-retailing projects. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(2), 43–60.

Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Lund, S., Nottebohm, O., Poulter, D., Jauch, S., & Ramaswamy, S. (2014, April). Global flows in a digital age: How trade, finance, people, and data connect the world economy (pp. 1–180). McKinsey Global Institute.

Muylle, S., & Vijverman, E. (2013, February). Online jobs boosting Europe’s competitiveness. IAB Europe, Vlerick Business School.

Nikulin, D. (2017). The impact of ICTs on women’s economic empowerment. In H. Kaur, E. Lech- man, & A. Marszk (Eds.), Catalyzing development through ICT adoption (Chapter 2, pp. 15–24). Basel: Springer International Publishing AG.

Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP, its measurement and significance. In Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section of American Statistical Association (pp. 98–104).

Parnami, M., & Bisawa, T. (2015). The rise of Indian women entrepreneur in e-commerce. Journal of Business and Management, 17(10), 36–40.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

Phillips, W. (1958). The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wages in the United Kingdom 1861–1957. Economica, 25(100), 283–299.

Raja, S., Imaizumi, S., Kelly, T., Narimatsu, J., Paradi-Guilford, C., & Ban, K. W. (2013, Septem- ber). Connecting to work. Retrieved from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDS ContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/09/09/000456286_20130909094536/Rendered/PDF/809770WP 0Conne00Box379814B00PUBLIC0.pdf

Sovbetov, Y., & Saka, H. (2018). Does it take two to tango: Interaction between credit default swaps and national stock indices. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 2(1), 129–149.

TUBISAD. (2016). Turkey e-commerce market report. Informatics Industry Association. Retrieved from http://www.tubisad.org.tr/duyuru/e-bulten/2017/temmuz17/TUBISAD-E-Ticaret-2016- Pazar-Buyuklugu-Raporu.pdf

Vera, R. E. (2006). Employment impact of business-to-consumer e-commerce on Philippine workers (Research paper series no: 2004-02). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.


Appendix 1


Table A1. Correlation analysis.


FE

EC

CC

GDP

IP

INF

FE

1

0.4986

0.1935

0.5345

0.2142

0.5762

EC

0.4986

1

0.3636

0.3282

0.3347

0.1682

CC

0.1935

0.3636

1

0.2462

0.4040

0.3132

GDP

0.5345

0.3282

0.2462

1

0.3598

0.4098

IP

0.2142

0.3347

0.4040

0.3598

1

0.2161

INF

0.5762

0.1682

0.3132

0.4098

0.2161

1