Fear, greed, and fraud: crypto scams across market cycles
Key Highlights
- Daily data cover 3096 cryptocurrency scams from 2018 to 2026.
- Rug pulls, honeypots, and technical exploits show distinct market sensitivities.
- Fraud incidence rises with stronger sentiment, liquidity, gas fees, and COVID-period conditions.
- Sentiment and volatility sensitivities weaken after Terra and remain lower after FTX.
- Stronger sentiment predicts more fraud but smaller conditional monetary losses.
Abstract
This study examines how investor-facing cryptocurrency fraud varies with market conditions, incident technology, and major market disruptions using daily data from the De.Fi REKT database over February 2018 to October 2026. The analytical sample contains 3,096 recorded incidents, with rug pulls, honeypots, and phishing classified as investor-facing fraud and technical exploits examined separately. Negative Binomial count models show that investor-facing fraud is more frequent when investor sentiment is stronger, markets are more liquid, Ethereum network activity is more intensive, and during the COVID period. These relationships remain comparatively stable across alternative outcome definitions, sentiment orthogonalization, and controls for temporally concentrated incidents. By contrast, the positive baseline volatility relationship weakens once concentration effects are addressed, while market-regime effects are not robust across alternative cycle filters. Formal cross-type tests reveal substantial heterogeneity: rug pulls are particularly responsive to sentiment and network activity, whereas technical exploits exhibit little systematic sensitivity to investor sentiment. Crisis-period interaction models further show that the pre-Terra sensitivities of fraud to sentiment and volatility weaken materially after the 2022 market disruptions. Monetary-loss models reveal a distinct incidence-severity trade-off: stronger sentiment is associated with more frequent fraud but smaller conditional losses, whereas volatility is more strongly related to loss magnitude once losses occur. Overall, cryptocurrency fraud is state-dependent, technology-specific, and multidimensional, implying that surveillance based solely on aggregate scam counts or broad market cycles can overlook important changes in fraud composition and financial severity.
APA Citation
Sovbetov, I. (2027). Fear, greed, and fraud: crypto scams across market cycles. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance , Vol.87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102740
BibTeX
@article{sovbetov2027fear,
author = {Ihlas Sovbetov},
title = {Fear, greed, and fraud: crypto scams across market cycles},
journal = {The North American Journal of Economics and Finance},
year = {2027},
doi = {10.1016/j.najef.2026.102740},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102740}
}